See the work behind
the grade.
Dwixel is the collaborative workspace built for universities — where every contribution is visible, every struggling group is flagged early, and assessment is backed by evidence, not guesswork.
Right now, group work is a black box.
When five names share one document, the grade hides who carried it — and who quietly disappeared. Faculty find out far too late. Students who pulled the weight feel cheated. Dwixel opens the box.
You can't see contribution
A finished document tells you nothing about who wrote what, who revised, or who never showed up.
Problems surface too late
By the time a group implodes or a member goes dark, the deadline has passed and intervention is impossible.
Grading is a guess
Peer ratings are political and unreliable. Faculty have no defensible evidence to grade individuals fairly.
Visibility, early warning, and evidence — in one place.
Know exactly who did the work.
Every edit, comment, and session is attributed in real time — across both documents and slide decks. Dwixel turns invisible effort into a clear, per-student contribution profile, without anyone filling out a form.
- Live contribution share per member
- Documents and presentations, both measured
- Attributed version history & activity timeline
Get flagged before it's a crisis.
Dwixel watches for the patterns that precede a failing group — a silent member, a last-minute scramble, a lopsided split — and surfaces them while there's still time to act.
- Inactivity & imbalance flags
- Lopsided-split detection
- Automated deadline reminders
Defensible, individual assessment.
When a group hands in, every member signs off and the work is frozen into a locked, timestamped record. Grade individuals on what they actually did — against exactly what was submitted — and back up every mark if a student appeals.
- Per-student contribution reports
- Locked submission snapshots
- Evidence trail for appeals
| Student | Share | Edits | Suggested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maya A. | 38% | 142 | A |
| Jordan L. | 31% | 118 | A− |
| Priya R. | 27% | 96 | B+ |
| Tom K. | 4% | 3 | Review |
A grade should be explainable. A student should be able to see exactly why theirs is what it is — and an instructor should be able to step in weeks before a group falls apart, not after.
Built to run at the department and institution level.
Dwixel is governed at the institutional level: coordinators and IT keep control, faculty get oversight, and students just open a document. Privacy and roles are enforced in the database, not by convention.
Privacy by design
Instructors can review the group’s work and see who contributed what. Peer review stays confidential, work is never exposed to other groups or the public, and access is enforced by row-level security.
Role-based oversight
Organisation, department, faculty and student roles, separated at the database level. Coordinators oversee only their own classes.
Evidence & recovery
Locked submission snapshots, attributed version history, and automatic content backups — defensible records that survive accidental loss.
Programme analytics
Department-level views of engagement, group health, and students at risk of falling behind.
On the roadmap: SSO / SCIM provisioning and LTI 1.3 grade passback for Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard and D2L.
Bring accountability
to group work.
See a walkthrough with your own course structure. We'll show oversight, early-warning, and evidence in action — in 30 minutes.